Tuesday, May 15, 2018

ENDNOTE


ENDNOTE
================================================================
I would like to admit that my remarks were not written based on particularly well thought out plans. In fact, I was still progressing with my thoughts on the details of the tao te ching while trying to elaborate on my general viewpoints of the book. This was a good opportunity for me to organize my thoughts and delve deeper into some of the philosophical issues that I was interested in.

One of the reasons I decided to write on the tao te ching was that I was not able to discover any reference materials or books that provided very detailed analyses of the book in relation to western philosophy. Of course, I do not believe that by any means I was able to provide sufficient analyses that satisfactorily answer the issues that I discussed. In fact, one will notice many holes, flaws or inconsistencies in my writings. I always welcome any constructive critiques of my writings even though deep in my mind I am allergic to any type of criticism.

One may justifiably argue that my writings are far from polished and somewhat unorganized and mix lots of seemingly unrelated issues that seem to miss the point. One may even argue that my points are quite extreme, puerile, and biased. Nevertheless, writing on this blog was personally a good philosophical exercise for me and I do not regret writing them.

By the point of writing this endnote, I cannot help but admit that all these remarks were written essentially from Hegelian perspectives. I wish to come back to this blog about a decade later with different philosophical subjects, and I hope I will have improved significantly in my understanding of philosophy and intellectual issues.

Thank you.

Chapter 81


Chapter 81
True words do not sound beautiful;
beautiful sounding words are not true.
Wise men don’t need to debate;
men who need to debate are not wise.
Wise men are not scholars,
and scholars are not wise.
The Master desires no possessions.
Since the things she does are for the people,
she has more than she needs.
The more she gives to others,
the more she has for herself.
The Tao of Heaven nourishes by not forcing.
The Tao of the Wise person acts by not competing.
================================================================

When Einstein published his theory of relativity, people needed solid evidence based on experiments. When he was told that his theory was proved to be accurate through an experiment based on some solar eclipse phenomenon, his response was rather cold. He replied it was them who needed the result and not him. Nevertheless, unlike philosophy, science needs verifiable results, and Einstein was in need of experimental results that can corroborate his theory. Every scientific theory, however convincing and accurate it looks, needs verification through empirical results. The power of science originates from this. That our theoretical or mathematical constructions do not end up being speculation but establish links between our reasoning power and empirical observations. Therefore, Einstein had to be “debatable.”

Although this chapter says otherwise, wise men do need “to debate.”  The concept of “dialectics” is based on constructive discourse between two opposing debaters.

Chapter 80


Chapter 80
Small countries with few people are best.
Give them all of the things they want,
and they will see that they do not need them.
Teach them that death is a serious thing,
and to be content to never leave their homes.
Even though they have plenty
of horses, wagons and boats,
they won’t feel that they need to use them.
Even if they have weapons and shields,
they will keep them out of sight.
Let people enjoy the simple technologies,
let them enjoy their food,
let them make their own clothes,
let them be content with their own homes,
and delight in the customs that they cherish.
Although the next country is close enough
that they can hear their roosters crowing and dogs barking,
they are content never to visit each other
all of the days of their lives.
================================================================
This is the Utopia dreamt of by Lao Tzu. Small countries with no need to interfere with one another. Peaceful enough that weapons are of no use. If all people can enjoy and remain satisfied with this simple, plain life style, no one will have to suffer. Our Earth won’t have to suffer.

Chapter 79


Chapter 79
Difficulties remain, even after solving a problem.
How then can we consider that as good?
Therefore the Master
does what she knows is right,
and makes no demands of others.
A virtuous person will do the right thing,
and persons with no virtue will take advantage of others.
The Tao does not choose sides,
the good person receives from the Tao
because she is on its side.
================================================================
“Difficulties remain, even after solving a problem.”

Watching the American drama series “John Adams,” I thought that indeed problems are non-ending. Adams’ primary purpose was to emancipate the United States from the “chains” of Great Britain. Even after hard earned liberation from the colonial rule of England, however, political problems ensued in his own new independent country. He had family problems and was involved in lots of messy, complicated political issues. As long as you are alive, you will continue to have problems in life.

Chapter 78


Chapter 78
Water is the softest and most yielding substance.
Yet nothing is better than water,
for overcoming the hard and rigid,
because nothing can compete with it.
Everyone knows that the soft and yielding
overcomes the rigid and hard,
but few can put this knowledge into practice.
Therefore the Master says:
“Only he who is the lowest servant of the kingdom,
is worthy to become its ruler.
He who is willing to tackle the most unpleasant tasks,
is the best ruler in the world.”
True sayings seem contradictory.
================================================================
This chapter strangely reminds me of Jesus portrayed as a humble servant of God and an apt ruler of the kingdom endorsed by God.

I must say that the content of this chapter can be realized only in a small village or community. Elsewhere, none of this can work. The larger a country grows, the more difficult it becomes to exercise control. What mostly matters in today’s arena of politics is an image of humility and not whether you are really humble deepest in your mind.

“True sayings seem contradictory.

Soren Kierkegaard also notes that truth is paradoxical. He likes to discuss various subject matters from a paradoxical point of view. (Upon reading even several excerpts from his books, however, people like me should risk feeling all gloomy and dark and being contaminated by his depressive thoughts. There is something about Kierkegaard that makes me not want to read him. His thoughts and tendencies are somewhat suffocating. Unlike Nietzsche, another pioneer of “existentialism,” his writings seem to lack energy even though they might be insightful. His biography is also distinctly lethargic and “lame.”)

Although several philosophers including Kierkegaard like to deliberately employ paradox as a tool for unfolding their ideas, it does appear that truths are inherently paradoxical and cannot be expressed other than through paradoxical statements. Even in formal mathematics, there is a paradox. Godel solidly proved it.

Chapter 77


Chapter 77
The Tao of Heaven works in the world
like the drawing of a bow.
The top is bent downward;
the bottom is bent up.
The excess is taken from,
and the deficient is given to.
The Tao works to use the excess,
and gives to that which is depleted.
The way of people is to take from the depleted,
and give to those who already have an excess.
Who is able to give to the needy from their excess?
Only someone who is following the way of the Tao.
This is why the Master gives
expecting nothing in return.
She does not dwell on her past accomplishments,
and does not glory in any praise.
================================================================
Here we see a new metaphor from Laozi: the drawing of a “bow.” From a Taoist worldview, nothing stays the same eternally. Accordingly, there is only a cyclic movement of “up” and “down” and “up” and “down.” A bow that is drawn will naturally have to return to its previous loose state; otherwise, its string may cut off sometime. Based on this metaphor, one can say that one’s misfortune may not last forever and one day he will see arrival of good fortune. Greene similarly notes:

“Like mastering your emotions, patience is a skill – it does not come naturally. But nothing about power is natural; power is more godlike than anything in the natural world. And patience is the supreme virtue of the gods, who have nothing but time. Everything good will happen – the grass will grow again, if you give it time and see several steps into the future. Impatience, on the other hand, only makes you look weak. It is a principal impediment to power.”

Reading Greene’s thoughtful advice, I happen to remember a guy singing “Annie’s Tomorrow” in the American sitcom “Friends.” The guy sings, “There will be the sun tomorrow, bet tomorrow! There’ll be the dollar.”

However, I remarked regarding one of the above chapters that although it is usually true that we have to learn to deal with the ups and downs in our lives, there are moments that some of us rightfully judge that it seems like there is no end in their ongoing pain. In most cases, the “grass will grow again,” but there are rare cases of people among us that betray this principle. That is, there are definitely people who only continue to suffer and can realistically do nothing but suffer.

In fact, on a more “global” scale, as Schopenhauer rightfully argues, the world is mostly full of immense pain and agonies. Even though there are several good things in the world, you do not have to be a Schopenhauerian pessimist in order to conclude that the bad things far outweigh the better things.

Although Laozi says that the Tao of the Heaven proceeds according to its own yin and yang, human suffering is a never changing constant and never gets any better. The tragedies of human affairs are so immense that any positive features that we may discover about our existence are essentially trivial in comparison. The world abounds in so much suffering that it almost looks as though the aim of life is to suffer.

What personally disturbs me is that the universe or our world could have been born otherwise. The universe could have been constructed much differently. Or there could have been a universe created and ruled by a benign one God that never allowed birth of evil at all in the minds of humans. If the universe was constructed much differently, we did not have to emerge through evolutionary contention against the other species. Also, we could imagine a utopia where no one ever dies no one ever suffers an illness, no one ever ages and all of us live peacefully in harmony together and praise one God as Christians hope. But why is it that we happen to discover ourselves in a universe of only so much sorrow and pain? Why is it that of the two worlds possible – one good and the other like the hell that we are living in – we happen to be born in this world and witness and suffer never ending pain?

Human history is mostly full of tragedy, and it is my view that the Tao prefers to let it stay that way.




Chapter 76


Chapter 76
The living are soft and yielding;
the dead are rigid and stiff.
Living plants are flexible and tender;
the dead are brittle and dry.
Those who are stiff and rigid
are the disciple of death.
Those who are soft and yielding
are the disciples of life.
The rigid and stiff will be broken.
The soft and yielding will overcome.
================================================================
This chapter is another variation of the Taoist principle, so I have no further comments.

Chapter 75


Chapter 75
When people go hungry,
the government’s taxes are too high.
When people become rebellious,
the government has become too intrusive.
When people begin to view death lightly,
wealthy people have too much
which causes others to starve.
Only those who do not cling to their life can save it.
================================================================
The last verse of the chapter reminds me of Lee Soon Shin, the marine general and wartime hero that saved Chosun from Japan. He said that those that seek to survive in battle will die but those that seek death will survive. I do not know what he meant when he said that, but it sometimes looks that “hypochondriacs” can tragically die earlier than alcoholics or heavy smokers. Not that I am saying that it is okay you should become an alcoholic.


Chapter 74


Chapter 74
If you do not fear death,
then how can it intimidate you?
If you aren’t afraid of dying,
there is nothing you can not do.
Those who harm others
are like inexperienced boys
trying to take the place of a great lumberjack.
Trying to fill his shoes will only get them seriously hurt.
================================================================
This chapter illustrates well the success “formula” of the 50th Law. “Nihil timendum est,” says Robert Greene. However, one should note that neither Lao Tzu nor Greene is encouraging wild boldness “for the sake of thrill.” In fact, this chapter seems to encourage moderate fear.

Chapter 73


Chapter 73
Being over bold and confident is deadly.
The wise use of caution will keep you alive.
One is the way to death,
and the other is the way to preserve your life.
Who can understand the workings of Heaven?
The Tao of the universe
does not compete, yet wins;
does not speak, yet responds;
does not command, yet is obeyed;
and does act, but is good at directing.
The nets of Heaven are wide,
but nothing escapes its grasp.
================================================================


“Being over bold and confident is deadly.”

Ecclesiastes 9:11
I returned, and saw under the sun, that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all.” (King James Bible)

The above verse from the Old Testament can certainly be aptly applied to the above quotation from the tao te ching. However, I would like to approach the two quotes from various points of view.

The first point to note is that because even the wise and the brave are sometimes not spared the occasional turn of events against their favor, they always have to take a cautious approach.

However, there is another aspect I would like to point out here. Before that, I would like to narrate a personal childhood story of mine.

When I was a 6th grader at primary school, I entered a local county math competition with another girl in my class. We both were representatives from our school and were supposed to wipe out competitors from different primary schools in the small county. There were maybe four or five primary schools, I don’t know. All these schools, with my alma mater included, are simply located in some countryside and very far from major urban areas. Again, I say this was a very small local county and I did not think I could not win the gold medal in this small competition because I thought my math skills were at a high school student’s level. I don’t know how I was even able to think that. In fact, my father urged me to study middle school and high school math textbooks in advance – which I think now was pure mental insanity – so I studied them and thought that I mastered them. That was obviously an illusion only possible in the mind of a young naïve child. I think I was able to sustain that illusion for a while because when I solved some very elementary workout problems in those textbooks and saw that my answers were right, I thought I mastered the math concepts. In fact, I was merely doing the calculations suggested in the exemplary answers. When I saw that my answers were right, I mistakenly believed I mastered the high school level math.

I went to the public local education center and took the math competition test. It was too difficult, and I got screwed up and completely broke down in the test center. I remember crying every day for about a week. It was a crushing loss. The girl that I entered the competition with actually did better on the test than me, and I felt very humiliated and devastated; I could not believe that a girl could be better than me in some respect (she won a silver medal, and me a bronze medal; there were several gold, silver and bronze medals.). I was not able to explain or justify how I screwed up the test, so the only way of convincing myself that the whole test affair was not fair or real was to read repeatedly the above verse of Ecclesiastes. I am, in fact, a superior math boy. But I failed the test because I was too nervous and broke under pressure. It is not that I was bad at math, but actually very good at math, but was too anxious, and I failed it. This is how I thought. I repeatedly uploaded some piece of writing explaining why I failed the test but still am a good math boy on a Yahoo board and added the verse of Ecclesiastes because that seemed to well explain that even skilled people can sometimes fail because of misfortune, but it seemed that somebody kept deleting my uploads. I also sent a letter to my class teacher explaining that the whole test thing was a scam because I was not able to fully showcase my abilities because I was too anxious. Now I think that when I was young I was too delusional and could not believe that other kids could be superior to me. But the reality was that I failed a small local county size math competition. Nonetheless, I could not bear the thinking that I lost. It was too much for me to psychologically process at young age.

You may wonder by now what I am trying to get at. Note the above verse of Ecclesiastes again. Did Solomon not say “time and chance happeneth to them all”? Because some bad luck can happen to all, I was one of them and unlucky, so failed the test. However, Solomon’s dictum can virtually justify every situation, and losers like me can blame bad luck every time they taste bad results and things do not work their way.

OK. I understand that the above autobiographical narrative of mine is actually only remotely related to what should be a discussion on the content of the chapter of the tao te ching itself. Nevertheless, this whole affair – the Ecclesiastes thing and how I used the verse to make an excuse for my failure – personally reminds me of the limitation of the tao te ching: its content is too vague. If you say that the tao is not the eternal tao that you can say or define, then, in principle, this can virtually apply everywhere. This is like Socrates saying that he doesn’t know a shit, so if people simply talk like him saying that they don’t know a shit, then it all makes them some sages.


Even though Nietzsche’s perspectivism allows various interpretations of texts or phenomenon in general, it does not mean that every theory or interpretation can be valuable. Just because poetry can be written by anyone does not mean that poems that they write are all equal in their literary merits.


“The Tao of the universe does not compete, yet wins”

One mere individual cannot match the vastness of the Heaven. Therefore, what one can only do is to open himself up to the “influence” of the Heaven.

However, this chapter reminds me of Sun Tzu’s Art of War again. A superior warrior expends only a little amount of energy and yet submits you.

Somebody that is really good in competition seems to know every one of your movements. He instinctively anticipates your next turns.

When practicing jiu-jit su as a white belt, I realized that experienced practitioners of jiu jit su did not even have to drain their energy so hard in order to submit their comparatively inexperienced sparring partners. They instead make their opponents wear themselves out cardio-wise and then handily and swiftly submit them when they are exhausted. Or when they see a small opening in their opponent, they exploit it quickly.The high level practitioners of jiu jit su consciously do not expend much energy in the first round of sparring because they want to conserve their energy and continue with the remaining sparring sessions. Therefore, when sparring with white belts, they do not even seem like they are competing that hard. They simply do it apparently easily and swiftly. They “do not compete and yet win.”


Chapter 72


Chapter 72
When people become overly bold,
then disaster will soon arrive.
Do not meddle with people’s livelihoods;
if you respect them, they will in turn respect you.
Therefore, the Master knows herself but is not arrogant.
She loves herself but also loves others.
This is how she is able to make appropriate choices.
================================================================
The people working at convenience stores or malls or coffee shops know whether you are respectful to them or not. If you are not respectful to them, they may secretly spit in your coffee and provide it to your service. Do not make enemies of people that will treat you well unless you disrespect them.


Chapter 71


Chapter 71
Knowing you don’t know is wholeness.
Thinking you know is a disease.
Only by recognizing that you have an illness
can you move to seek a cure.
The Master is whole because
she sees her illnesses and treats them,
and thus is able to remain whole.
================================================================
Wittgenstein once criticized Socrates for claiming to know nothing and suggested that this is not a proper attitude required of a philosopher. Judging from this chapter, we may reasonably speculate that Lao Tzu might have agreed with Socrates if he had known him.

I am not sure if you can proclaim yourself to be wise when you say you a knower of nothing. However, when one admits candidly that he does not know very much about something he is not really good at, we can at least say he is not suffering the “disease” mentioned in this chapter. However, the thing is there are too many people that pretend to know everything very well, and Socrates and Lao Tzu might have had them in mind when criticizing the so called “knowers.”

(Although Socrates might have been the wisest of all in Athens, he perhaps did not know how not to cause the wrath of Athenian citizens. It is unwise to fight against the public or admonish them to their anger. I partially agree with one Korean public servant in education who said that people in general are like “dogs and pigs”; that is, they are unwise and short-sighted like animals. Whether or not what he said was true, he did not foresee that he would get fired because of that expression. Whether the people in general are smarter than you or not, it is never wise to fight them head on. A group of people is always stronger than you.)

When my uncle was once too drunk and my grandmother scolded him, he said angrily that he was not drunk. It was obvious even to the eyes of a child (I was a primary school kid back then) that he was drunk. But he continued to shout and denied he was drunk. If he really thought he was not drunk then, I am sure this was an illness. If you cannot tell whether you are sober or drunk, you should probably stop drinking alcohol at all. Similarly, gambling addicts deny their problem as well. Or even drug addicts. They do not think they are addicted when they suffer a relapse and blame their wives or friends. They think they can escape whenever they choose to, but they are simply being delusional. They cannot help themselves and need professional treatments. They will not overcome their problems on their own.

Another point to note here is that even the sage can have an “illness.” This illness may not necessarily be a physical one. It may also refer to some flaws in personality or thinking habits. The sage is never a perfect human being and because of his recognition of this truth he is able to approach wholeness. In my own personal view, the Laozian sage is careful not to make the mistakes that a misguided Confucian sage often commits. Again, in my own view, the Confucian sage is prone to develop the personality disorder of looking down on non-sages because of his rigid adherence to rituals and literal meanings of the Confucian teachings, or the Analects. (Confucius is also in contrast with Laozi in terms of compassion. He does not seem to have had any compassion at all for those that were not “gentlemanly” enough.)

Then how can a sage know that he is in error or that something is wrong about him? Although legends say that Lao Tzu mostly taught his disciples through silence, I believe that the teacher himself occasionally needed feedback from his disciples or companions. Without engaging in this form of “dialectics” – or a dialogue, more precisely – it is difficult for the sage to get to truly know about himself. If you are closed off from others and think heavily only in solitude, it is difficult to maintain a healthy viewpoint of yourself and the world. Remember Friedrich Nietzsche. Even in the eyes of Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis, this one of the most influential philosophers that ever lived was a brilliant psychologist. Freud was reluctant to further read the texts of Nietzsche, because the core content of his psychoanalysis was mostly anticipated by Nietzschean thoughts. Nevertheless, Nietzsche was not able to prevent himself from falling deeper into isolation and depression. His later books such as Ecce Homo were not certainly written when he was in his sane mind.

One Korean writer on Hegel, wrote in his book that a Hegelian “sage” (he never wrote this term; I invented it) is different from a Kantian or Stoic sage. Whereas the latter type of sage is solitary or all alone and maintains “Stoic” indifference to other people’s affairs, a sage in a Hegelian sense is able to see himself by discovering himself in the Other. You never exist alone. The Other is a kind of mirror; you can discover yourself by looking in the mirror. (If I am right, Zizek notes that Hegel is a Lacanian, and Lacan is a Hegelian; that is, Hegelianism anticipates Lacanianism.)

The disciples or less taoistic companions of a Laozian sage may not match his wisdom. Nevertheless, this does not indicate that he has nothing to learn from them. If the Laozian sage thought otherwise, he would be committing the error of a self-righteous Confucian sage. The Laozian sage is unafraid to get “muddied.” He is open to external influence and even wants to be influenced in one sense, but he is able to return to his “Laozian” composure and calmness. This is how the Laozian sage maintains a proper view of himself.


Chapter 70


Chapter 70
My words are easy to understand
and easier to put into practice.
Yet no one in the world seems to understand them,
or be able to apply what I teach.
My teachings come from the ancients,
the things I do are done for a reason.
Because you do not know me,
you are not able to understand my teachings.
Because those who know me are few,
my teachings become even more precious.
================================================================
Laozi’s words are plain and simple but very often contradictory. However, I cannot agree that his words are all easy to understand. The initial chapters of the tao te ching are actually very difficult. There are varying interpretations of his teachings, which means that it is not easy to conclude on what Laozi wanted to say, so you do not have to feel baffled when you read this chapter.

Chapter 69


Chapter 69
There is an old saying:
“It is better to become the passive
in order to see what will happen.
It is better to retreat a foot
than to advance only an inch.”
This is called
being flexible while advancing,
pushing back without using force,
and destroying the enemy without engaging him.
There is no greater disaster
than underestimating your enemy.
Underestimating your enemy
means losing your greatest assets.
When equal forces meet in battle,
victory will go to the one
that enters with the greatest sorrow.
================================================================
This chapter reminds us of Sun Tzu who argued that the best victory in war is to win by not fighting. Without bloodshed, you conserve your resources and earn dominion over your enemy. This is the most ideal victory imaginable, he says. “Destroying the enemy without engaging him” is the quote that aptly describes Sun Tzu’s formula.

Chapter 68


Chapter 68
The best warriors
do not use violence.
The best generals
do not destroy indiscriminately.
The best tacticians
try to avoid confrontation.
The best leaders
become servants of their people.
This is called the virtue of non-competition.
This is called the power to manage others.
This is called attaining harmony with the heavens.
================================================================
In the 50th Law, Curtis Jackson the rapper says that if somebody reads fear in your eyes in the slum you will be ignored and exposed to more danger and threats from other hustlers. Therefore, Laozi’s advice to try to avoid confrontation should be understood in a different sense. When you want to avoid confrontation, it is not because you fear it but you decide that it is a better choice than confrontation. If you should choose confrontation as the last resort, do it decisively and leave no doubt.


Chapter 67


Chapter 67
The world talks about honoring the Tao,
but you can’t tell it from their actions.
Because it is thought of as great,
the world makes light of it.
It seems too easy for anyone to use.
There are three jewels that I cherish:
compassion, moderation, and humility.
With compassion, you will be able to be brave,
With moderation, you will be able to give to others,
With humility, you will be able to become a great leader.
To abandon compassion while seeking to be brave,
or abandoning moderation while being benevolent,
or abandoning humility while seeking to lead
will only lead to greater trouble.
The compassionate warrior will be the winner,
and if compassion is your defense you will be secure.
Compassion is the protector of Heaven’s salvation.
================================================================
I agree that compassion is a good human trait; however, one should note that compassion is often deliberately exploited by some of those that are not so good. Many criminals target those that cannot control their compassion. In Korea, one mid-aged man saw a homeless person lying on the street and out of compassion for him he brought the beggar to his home. When he left for work, however, the homeless man raped his wife. Admittedly, this person did not mean to be noticed by the mid-aged man in order to exploit his compassion and rape his wife. But what did he do? He returned the favor by raping his beloved wife. It is not worth showing any compassion for a man like him, so you should be selective in choosing whom to show you compassion for.