Chapter 27
A good traveler
leaves no tracks,
and a skillful speaker is well rehearsed.
A good bookkeeper has an excellent memory,
and a well made door is easy to open and needs no locks.
A good knot needs no rope and it can not come undone.
and a skillful speaker is well rehearsed.
A good bookkeeper has an excellent memory,
and a well made door is easy to open and needs no locks.
A good knot needs no rope and it can not come undone.
Thus the Master
is willing to help everyone,
and doesn’t know the meaning of rejection.
She is there to help all of creation,
and doesn’t abandon even the smallest creature.
This is called embracing the light.
and doesn’t know the meaning of rejection.
She is there to help all of creation,
and doesn’t abandon even the smallest creature.
This is called embracing the light.
What is a good
person but a bad person’s teacher?
What is a bad person but raw material for his teacher?
If you fail to honor your teacher or fail to enjoy your student,
you will become deluded no matter how smart you are.
It is the secret of prime importance.
What is a bad person but raw material for his teacher?
If you fail to honor your teacher or fail to enjoy your student,
you will become deluded no matter how smart you are.
It is the secret of prime importance.
================================================================
Somebody that does something very well is recognized
instantly for his talent. When other
people see what he does, they know that he is on a different level in what he
does because everything that he does regarding what he is very good at is so
spontaneous. What he does does not seem to be much labored.
When I first learned swimming, I was a bit
disappointed with my lack of cardio. I
saw some school kids that were good swimmers and had no trouble flapping their
arms and legs for a long time. For me,
it was exhausting. When I dipped my head
in the pool water, I felt a bit panicky.
I felt slightly terrified because it was uncomfortable and it was not a
normal situation that I would be in. The
most difficult part for me was to learn how to breathe in and out. As I turned my head sideways to inhale air,
for example, water would come into my nostrils and mouth. I unintentionally swallowed the water and my
throat hurt.
However, as time went by, my swimming improved. I won’t discuss in too much detail the
process of my progress, but here is one fact that I realized. The more uncomfortable you are with
something, the more energy you have to consume to deal with it. If you are good at something, you do not even
consider it to be a demanding work. The
high school kids that I thought were very good cardio-wise because they were
young were just ordinary girls and no athletes.
They simply learned to be at ease with swimming through training (actually,
girls are faster learners of swimming than adult men). When my techniques improved, I no longer
gasped for more breath and did not pant heavily after finishing a lane. I was very comfortable, at least in a pool (I’ve
never tried open water swimming, but if I do try it, I know it will be a
totally different environment, so I’m not really up for it.).
I remember reading an article written on MRI
experiments on people speaking a foreign language. The experiment subjects are asked to speak
some expressions in a particular foreign language, and the experimenter takes
MRI scans of their brains. One guy that
is very fluent in that language shows very little activity in the brain. On the other hand, another guy that has just
started to learn that language shows lots of activity in his brain areas. This means that the less competent guy’s
brain is still trying to figure out what to do and at the stage of developing
as regards speaking the foreign language.
This lack of effort is also observed among
janitors. An experienced janitor does
his job very swiftly and with less effort than an inexperienced janitor. Blue-collar jobs or hard labors also require
huge levels of efforts and skills.
“What is a good
person but a bad person’s teacher? What is a bad person but raw material
for his teacher?”
Conservative hardliners must be well aware of the
meaning of the above quote. Say that South Korea achieves unification with the
North or at least establishes lasting peace or amicable relationships between
the two Koreas. What happens then? The staunch conservatives lose influence
among the moderate conservatives. They need a target or enemy to fight against
so that they can continue voicing their thoughts and instill the fear of the
North in the minds of the moderate conservatives. They actually thrive on terror.
If we achieve unification, we no longer need these anti-North politicians. I
believe that North Korea is a real substantial threat to our security, but what
happens if these threats disappear completely? The politicians of the
conservative party may lose most of their fan base; they lose power, to put it
briefly.
Many Japanese animation films for children are
based on the themes of good versus evil. The robots and good-looking characters
take revenge on the evil, ugly people that harm the society. The thing is, if
these evil roles disappear completely, the righteous robots and characters will
lose their place. Ironically, they may be the first ones to lament the
disappearance of evil. This is no laughing matter because Sherlock Holmes also
agonized over his boredom after the death of Professor Moriarty. He lost an
evil man that he could regard as a target to teach a lesson. That is why Holmes
mourned Moriarty’s death.
Likewise, Yahweh had to create Satan to make the
stories unfold in the Bible. There had to be evil doers on earth so that He
could later punish them through floods or Armageddon.
Likewise, the people of the warring states of
ancient China had to find themselves in deep trouble in order for Laozi to
write down the tao te ching to teach them. Nevertheless, because Laozi did not
want to be seen as a sage making use of the political chaos and elevating his
status as a thoughtful spiritual guru of the times, he opted to retreat into
countryside. He did write the tao te ching, but did not tell much about
himself. To this day, we still do not know whether Laozi was a single person or
merely a name for referring to a group of recluse intellectuals.
No comments:
Post a Comment